Categories
GUEST EDITOR

From The Desk Of Bob Mould: Andreas Vesalius

bobmouldlogoBob Mould is a man always on the lookout for a new challenge. After Hüsker Dü (one of the most celebrated rock bands ever) folded in 1988, Mould would helm another powerful trio, Sugar, before beginning a fascinating, ongoing series of solo releases that have ranged from introspective to danceable, from melodic to nearly chaotic. The enigmatic guitar (and cultural) hero is finishing up what promises to be a fascinating memoir to be published next year and has just released a rock-solid solo disc, Life And Times. Read our new Q&A with him and earlier ones from 2008 and 2002. Mould will be guest editing magnetmagazine.com all this week.

vesaliuddip550Mould: In years past, there has been some controversy surrounding the various “body” exhibits that travel the world. Three years ago, I attended one of these cadaver displays in Philadelphia and found it to be a fascinating experience. While reading various articles outlining procedure and protest, I found myself transported back in time, to the 1543 and 1555 editions of Andreas Vesalius‘ epic work, De humani corporis fabrica. It was considered one of the greatest books of the 16th century and was the cornerstone of the understanding of the human body. The skill Vesalius possessed in flaying and dissecting the cadavers is evident; the illustrations are something to behold. The detail in which the body is displayed and explained is fascinating, and the situational allegories of each diagram add yet another dimension. Beyond the obvious, though, lies another testament to Vesalius’ focus, vision and care. The incredibly detailed notes to the printer are beyond thorough, with fine use of descriptive and directional language. In today’s world of iconographic representation, digital duplication and global positioning, it is refreshing to see an example of a creator who is so immersed in the intricacies of the proper replication of technical work. Also, make note of Vesalius’ comments regarding the deletion of his dedicatory letter in a prior work and the political overtones of altering accreditation for political gain.